Top military commanders advised against eliminating a key civilian protection program, according to internal polls. Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth ignored the guidance and proceeded with the cuts anyway, raising alarms about future civilian casualties.
Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth has eliminated a program meant to shield civilians during U.S. military operations, even after senior commanders strongly recommended keeping it. The move comes amid ongoing debates about rules of engagement and the ethical conduct of American forces overseas.
Internal polling showed that most top officers believed the initiative helped reduce unintended harm to noncombatants and preserved the military's moral standing. Commanders argued that the program provided essential training and oversight, yet Hegseth cited cost savings and streamlined operations as reasons for its removal.
Advocates warn the decision may increase civilian deaths and invite international criticism. Lawmakers are now considering hearings to examine the rationale and explore whether funding can be restored through legislation.

